precedential law may – 3without exaggeration – thus be considered the natural home of analogical reasoning. Inference from analogy, however, features in the domain of statutory law as well. As Neil MacCormick points out, “argument from analogy is by no means uncommon or unimportant in the application and interpretation of

American Legal Argumentation: The Law and Literature/Rhetoric Movement. [REVIEW] Eileen A. Scallen - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):705-717. Neil MacCormick's Second Thoughts on Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory.

The author proceeds from a brief elucidation of the concept “argumentation” through a more extended account of substantive reasons in pure practical argumentation and of institutional argumentation applying “authority reasons” as grounds for legal decisions to an initial account of the nature and place of legal interpretative reasoning. 1995-07-01 Neil MacCormick (ed.) - 1978 - Oxford University Press. Analogy Argumentation in Law: A Dialectical Perspective. [REVIEW] Harm Kloosterhuis - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):173-187.

By Neil MacCormick. Cite . BibTex; Full citation Abstract. El autor parte de una breve elucidación del concepto de Defeasibility – 4. Interpretation and the Rule of Law – Bibliography 1.

This chapter attempts to establish, with close reference to actual instances of judicial interpretation, what should be acknowledged as good arguments for interpretative conclusions. Topics discussed include categories of interpretative argument, conflicting arguments and conflict resolution, and interpretation within practical argumentation.

Seminar 10. Michael Moore’s Natural Law Theory of Interpretation (Read Moore, “A Natural Law Theory of Interpretation”) Spaak Torben: Wed 18 Oct 2017 13:00-16:00: D255: Seminar 11. Comparing and Evaluating the Theories of MacCormick, Dworkin, and Eskridge I: Statutory Interpretation. Analyze Caminetti, Holyfield. Spaak Torben: Mon 23 Oct

Abstract The author proceeds from a brief elucidation of the concept “argumentation” through a more extended account of substantive reasons in pure practical argumentation and of institutional argumentation applying “authority reasons” as grounds for legal decisions to an initial account of the nature and place of legal interpretative reasoning. Neil MacCormick on Interpretation, Defeasibility, and the Rule of Law ∗∗ 1.

Argumentation and interpretation in Law . By Neil MacCormick. Cite . BibTex; Full citation Abstract. El autor parte de una breve elucidación del concepto de

He was Regius Professor of Public Law and the Law of Nature and Nations at the University of Edinburgh from 1972 until 2008. Topics discussed include categories of interpretative argument, conflicting Rhetoric and The Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning. Neil MacCormick. of legal argument in the context of the judicial interpretation of statutory rules. Neil MacCormick Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning soning was to explain the nature of legal argumentation as it manifests itself in court NEIL MACCORMICK, LEGAL REASONING AND LEGAL THEORY (2d ed . 1994) constitutional) interpretation, the judge should begin with a tex-.

Neil maccormick argumentation and interpretation in law

The author proceeds from a brief elucidation of the concept “argumentation” through a more extended account of substantive reasons in pure practical argumentation and of institutional argumentation applying “authority reasons” as grounds for legal decisions to an initial account of the nature and place of legal interpretative reasoning. Argumentation and interpretation in law. Neil Maccormick 1 Maccormick, N. Argumentation and interpretation in law. Argumentation 9, 467–480 (1995 Argumentation and Interpretation in Law. Neil Maccormick - 1993 - Ratio Juris 6 (1):16-29. Reconstructing Complex Analogy Argumentation in Judicial Decisions: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.

Introduction . Neil MacCormick has deeply influenced contemporary legal theory. The importance of his studies on practical reasoning in general and on legal reasoning and legal argumentation in particular, on legal institutionalism, on sovereignty, on the theory of rights and on the rule of law can hardly be exaggerated. pp.
Skatteverket kalmar oppettider

karolinska institutet jobb
utvecklingssekreterare malmö
yrkesutbildningar örebro
ki reserv
arvika gjuteri allabolag
kreditkort trots betalningsanmarkningar
margaret berg obituary

Título alternativo: Argumentation and interpretation in Law Palabras clave: MacCormick, Neil | Argumentación práctica | Argumentación institucional | Razones

2003. Case law about insults shows that clear rules about this interpretation are lacking and that the argumentation is often backed with rather vague references to ‘the meaning in context’ and ‘the specific circumstances of the case’. This vague-ness results in uncertainty and – sometimes – in absurd consequences in case law on this topic. Sir Donald Neil MacCormick QC FBA FRSE (27 May 1941 – 5 April 2009) was a Scottish legal philosopher and politician. He was Regius Professor of Public Law and the Law of Nature and Nations at the University of Edinburgh from 1972 until 2008. Topics discussed include categories of interpretative argument, conflicting Rhetoric and The Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning. Neil MacCormick.

Neil MacCormick of the University of Edinburgh, and Professor. Robert Surnmers of irrelevant, arguments in the particular context of a given legal sys- tem.

“Wykładnia a fortiori” [Interpretation a fortiori], Zeszyty naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiel- lonskiego. “Rätt och fel i juridisk argumentation” [Right and wrong in legal reasoning], D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers.

Reform and tradition: changes and continuities in Neil MacCormick's concept of law / Massimo La Torre - 5. The master rule, normativity, and the institutional theory of law / Stefano Bertea Pt. IV. Jurisprudence. 6. Some reflections on the relationship between law and morality-Neil MacCormick's point of view / Marina Lalatta Costerbosa - 7. Argumentation and interpretation in Law: Autor/es: MacCormick, Palabras clave: MacCormick, Neil His conclusion is that legal argumentation is only partly 2 Legal Reasoning and European Laws: the Perspective of Neil MacCormick-Florence, 21 May 2010 social phenomena, is argumentative.”10 MacCormick is aware that Hart’s thesis on the “open texture of law”11 requires that a complete theory of law should not ignore or neglect the theme of argumentation.12 He clearly states that “a theory of legal reasoning requires and is required by a Law and Legal Interpretation . Edited By Fernando Atria Lemaitre, Neil MacCormick. Edition 1st Edition.